Exhibit E — Seat Appointment MSIG Template

Version: 2.2
Status: Draft
Date: 2026-10-18

Governing framework: Vaulta Network RFP Framework, Exhibit A to MSIG #5.

---

Purpose

This template is used to propose candidates for Steering Committee seats under the Vaulta Network RFP Framework.

How to use this template

Complete the sections below for each candidate and list candidates in priority order (Framework 3.1). Incomplete proposals should not be approved.

Appointments follow MSIG #5 Parts B and F and Framework sections 3 and 4; contracts, disclosures, and signing keys follow Framework 3.1b.

Block producers should check the published seat register before approving or executing a proposal; proposers should cancel proposals that can no longer fill any seat.

---

Proposal Title

Steering Committee Appointment — [SEAT NAME(S)]

Resolution mode

[Seat by seat (default) / All or nothing]

Seat by seat: Each appointment takes effect independently.

All or nothing: All appointments take effect together, or none do (Framework 3.1).

Candidates

For first appointments, use the terms above (Framework 3.4). For later appointments, use 12 months (3.2), or the remaining term when filling a vacancy (3.7). Record the applicable start date. Community seat appointments also follow section 4.

Eligibility checklist — confirm for all candidates:

• No candidate already holds a seat.
• No appointment breaches the affiliation rule against a sitting member or another candidate (Framework 2.4).
• Each candidate has no Treasury affiliation, or an express MSIG waiver at the Threshold is identified in the table (Framework 2.4a).
• No candidate is on the published ban register (Framework 6.6).

Candidate details — repeat for each candidate

[CANDIDATE NAME] — [SEAT]

• Background — [2–4 lines about suitability for the seat]
• Conflicts — [Connections to likely proposers, or "None declared"]
• Contact — [___]

Network vision statement

Each candidate writes about 300–800 words in plain language about their seat’s portfolio, with a translation where helpful (Framework 3.1a). An ECF statement meeting these requirements may be used.

A group of candidates may include a shared vision statement, but each candidate must still provide their own.

1. Network needs during my term — [___]
2. Funding priorities and what I would decline — [___]
3. Measures of success by the end of my term — [___]
4. Other positions or commitments block producers should know — [___]

Declare interests separately in the disclosure questionnaire (Framework 6.3a).

Optional note

[Any additional information about the seat appointment.]

Resolved clauses

RESOLVED, that each candidate is appointed to the seat and initial term listed in the table under MSIG #5 and the Framework, subject to the resolution mode and row priority above.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that each appointee accepts the Framework’s obligations and acknowledges the material conflict breach and permanent ban rules in section 6.6.

FURTHER RESOLVED, that an appointee may be replaced by a further MSIG Resolution if they miss the 30-day deadline under Framework 3.1b for their vision statement, signed contract, on-chain disclosure questionnaire, or registered signing key.